By Mark Altman - CEO, Altman Integrated Technologies Ltd
Many organisations have been aware for some time of the need to control the costs of print and copying. Usually this includes applying limits and rules around what some users can do and making everyone accountable. This typically re¬sults in a dramatic reduction in the number of printed pages by eliminating the waste associated with unwanted or acci¬dental printing.
This is good – but it’s only Phase 1 of the cost saving approach.
Some have jumped into using a managed service or click-charge based contract on their copiers and printers. The advantages are new equipment (faster, better quality output, more functional¬ity, lower cost per page) and more certainty on pricing and expenditure on consumables.
This is also good and we would refer to it as Phase 3. This is where
most people stop, thinking that the problem is solved, but you’ll notice
we’ve not covered Phase 2. So what is the missing phase? And what
additional phase is there beyond Phase 3?
PHASE 1 – Reduce the amount of pages produced
PHASE 2 – Reduce the amount of toner, ink and colour used
PHASE 3 – Reduce the amount of devices and reduce cost/page
PHASE 4 – Optimise your print and copy fleet
Let’s take a look at these phases in more detail...
PHASE 1
This is about reducing the amount of pages we produce, not by stopping legitimate printing, but by eliminating accidental or unwanted jobs. Ultimately making people more accountable for, and aware of, what they printing. Typical initiatives to support this include:
• Monitoring individual users print volumes and costs incurred
• Stopping accidental duplication of printing (repeated clicking of the print icon)
• Warning users what they are about to print before it goes to the printer
• Restricting the number of pages or copies that can be produced at one time
• Restricting the output of colour print jobs
• Restricting the types of documents being printed
• Enforcing the correct paper size and type of printing the printer understands
• Enforcing quotas based on value over a period of time
• Charging for printing, either entirely or on an excess basis
• Hold the printing in the queue until the user is ready to release it
PHASE 2
Once you have reduced the amount of pages being produced, the next phase focuses on reducing the amount of toner and ink that is used on each printed page.
As we know, so much of the output we generate is for internal use, individual use and often for draft purposes, so the potential to reduce the cost of each page we produce is significant. Ways to support this include:
• Specifying the amount of toner to be used for each printed page
• Enforcing the use of mono and/or duplex
• Enforcing policy by user, by device or by type of document
• Specifying different toner saving for text, graphics and images
Here’s some examples of policies that might be typically considered and enforced:
• Output on all but one or two selected devices to be forced to be printed in duplex
• All emails to be printed in duplex, mono and at 50% toner saving
• PowerPoint presentations printed on ink-jet devices to be forced to mono and at 30% toner saving on all content
• Smaller volume printers to be forced to use 40% toner saving on text content and 20% saving on images and graphic content
The latest technology can now deliver this functionality, providing savings of around 20% on standard text output without any perceptible difference. Because strict quality is not required on so much of what we produce the potential for reducing the use of toner, ink and colour is huge.
And because you can set policies based on different users, types of documents and devices – this flexibility ensures that where the highest quality of output is needed, this can still be achieved.
The key with this phase is that it is best done before Phase 3 – so that when you opt for the managed service approach your pricing will be lower and your savings amplified beyond what was previously possible. Remember once you are signed up for a managed service, the costs are fixed. You will pay for the wastage and overuse of toner that was in existence previously!
PHASE 3
This phase is about rationalising the number of devices, consolidating copiers, printers and scan¬ners and reducing your cost per page produced. This is achieved by utilising the latest technology for copying, printing and scanning. Replacing low volume, higher cost devices with larger capac¬ity, faster throughput and lower running cost devices. Usually this is achieved using the latest print engine and scanning technology and therefore provides an additional benefit of increased quality of the output.
This solution is often sold as a “managed service” where there is a fixed cost per page with dif¬ferent rates for mono and colour and different paper sizes. This is attractive as we have a known budgetable cost that includes no surprises – all hardware, software, toner and maintenance costs are generally included in the fee.
We’ve now reduced the amount of pages produced, we’ve reduced the amount of toner and col¬our that’s used, we’ve fixed the price at a lower level and improved the speed and quality of the output … what more can we do? The next step is Phase 4.
PHASE 4
This is about optimising your fleet of printers and copiers by monitoring and reviewing how all your devices are performing in your organisation. Taking a centralised view across all devices enables adjustment of your fleet capacity and location of devices in line with the changing trends within your business.
The technology in this area uses a network based software agent that collects device statistics using SNMP, periodically uploading the data into a hosted “cloud” application that then provides access to the analysed data via a secure web based, end user management portal.
Through the portal you can report on device usage and costs – but also see where some devices are being used beyond their stated capacity or where some are under utilised. The optimiser feature then reports on where some printers can be switched or replaced by others at lower cost taking into account purchase and running costs.
Through the contract management capability, you can set up your managed service contract pric¬es and it will provide an audit of all costs which can be used to compare with your provider’s bill¬ing information, and against other known contracts available from other vendors and suppliers.
This is an excellent way to gear up for the negotiation of your managed service renewal fee – or give you a great starting point for evaluating managed service providers.
AND BEYOND …
The Phases outlined address the scope of how much is printed, what is printed, the quality of the output and the speed and efficiency of the devices. Beyond this scope we advocate building on this further with the following initiatives:
• Scoreboard who is printing the most by user/department, mono/colour breakdown, A3/A4, duplex/simplex etc to increase accountability further, drive cost-awareness and achieve environmental targets.
• Examine the document workflow in your organisation – explore the provision of elec-tronic document management and job submission.
• Execute an awareness and training programme for staff on document management and encouraging scanning and electronic faxing.
• Explore the use of tablet devices for reading documents.
SUMMARY
By taking the FOUR PHASE approach, you will save significant volumes of output and associated costs of producing them. The Four Phases are sequential and inter-dependent – you need to do each one in order to achieve the maximum benefit.
If you’d like more information on any of the technologies referred to in this document, you can contact the author directly: Mark Altman – mark.altman@altman.co.uk – t: 0113 273 0300.
About the author:
Mark Altman is CEO of Altman Integrated Technologies Ltd, a UK based software house specialising in delivering cost savings in various areas of a company’s IT infrastructure and operations – including print, copy, email, web and voice.
Web site: http://www.altman.co.uk/.
Blog: http://www.altman.co.uk/blog
Green policy: http://www.altman.co.uk/files/greenpolicy.pdf
Blog’s view on Mark Altman’s paper above.
Mark has some very good points and suggestions for more efficient use of resources. These tend to use the software and systems his company sell, which are well proven. However similar results can be obtained from other software and systems.
Mark will agree that greater and more substantial savings can be obtained with an organization document strategy, including printing and photocopying procedures that is endorsed by the senior management of the company.
The University of East London, London South Bank University and charity Global Action Plan are working on a Green ICT project funded by JISC. The aim of the project is to investigate how barriers to Green ICT can be overcome within a HEI, especially in terms of cross-departmental working and implementing staff behavioural change programmes. We're looking at the specific issue of improving the efficiency of printing to deliver a long-term sustainable solution.
Saturday, 25 February 2012
Thursday, 23 February 2012
DIGITAL PRINT - THE FINAL PIECE OF THE JIGSAW
Although Purbrooks have deservedly gained a reputation for high quality litho printing, the litho process does not always suit every project. If a print run is particularly short, it may be more cost-effective to produce a job digitally. There should be no compromise to the finished look of the job.
There are many benefits to digital printing:
• Proofs can be supplied, produced on the finished material (which would be prohibitively expensive on a litho press).
• Turnaround time can be quicker.
• The option exists to produce only a few advance copies of a project if the artwork has not been finalised.
• Variable data can be incorporated in the printed literature. This opens up new promotional (personalisation, i.e. names, photos, special dates, QR and barcodes, etc.) and transactional (such as personalisation with billing information, with data in graphic forms, i.e. pie charts, bar charts, etc.)
The downsides are that:
• Digital printing becomes expensive on longer runs.
• Spot colours can normally only be represented out of 4 colour process (CMYK).
• Metallic inks cannot be used.
• Finishing processes that involve heat, such as gold foil blocking, cannot be used.
Reproduced and based on an article by kind permission of Martin Stern
Purbrooks.
Gresham Way, Wimbledon Park
London SW19 8ED
T: 020 8944 3200 F: 020 8944 3237
e: martin@purbrooks.co.uk
w: www.purbrooks.co.uk
There are many benefits to digital printing:
• Proofs can be supplied, produced on the finished material (which would be prohibitively expensive on a litho press).
• Turnaround time can be quicker.
• The option exists to produce only a few advance copies of a project if the artwork has not been finalised.
• Variable data can be incorporated in the printed literature. This opens up new promotional (personalisation, i.e. names, photos, special dates, QR and barcodes, etc.) and transactional (such as personalisation with billing information, with data in graphic forms, i.e. pie charts, bar charts, etc.)
The downsides are that:
• Digital printing becomes expensive on longer runs.
• Spot colours can normally only be represented out of 4 colour process (CMYK).
• Metallic inks cannot be used.
• Finishing processes that involve heat, such as gold foil blocking, cannot be used.
Reproduced and based on an article by kind permission of Martin Stern
Purbrooks.
Gresham Way, Wimbledon Park
London SW19 8ED
T: 020 8944 3200 F: 020 8944 3237
e: martin@purbrooks.co.uk
w: www.purbrooks.co.uk
When to go Digital?
Below is an extract from the research and practical experience of Martin Stern of Purbrooks limited and some information on the point at which offset litho and digital printing cross over so that best value and value for money can always be measured and assured. Purbrooks are a member of the British Printing Industries Federation (BPIF) and the BPIF teach and promote best practice.
There are two main reasons for choosing to print digitally: speed of turnaround and low cost on short runs.
The quick turnaround of digital print is due to the fact that the ink on toner-based machines dries instantly, even on uncoated stocks, so there is no delay in the printing process.
It is always best practice to have a hard copy proof, to ensure all colours are correct, and there are no problems in the PDF or using your chosen printing substrate or method.
This is because:
• the shade, colour, texture and reflection of paper, card, plastic, etc. varies with batches and processes.
• as toner/ink is Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black, (CMYK) and uses reflective light and some images on paper, card, plastic, etc. may limit contrast and look flat, dull or enhance contrast, colour or brilliance.
• as a screen view is projected light in Red, Green & Blue (RGB).
• A PDF may not have all the fonts embedded in the file, so the software may substitute another font.
The short run nature of digital jobs does allow the quicker option of approving just a PDF before printing, further speeding up the turnaround time, but is very hard to match a screen view with a hardcopy print view.
A digital press does not use printing plates and there is a much smaller machine make-ready time to charge out or recover.
Some software systems like Quite Imposing http://www.quite.com/imposing/ can cut down studio time for page imposition. This can be done on the fly or with templates, so there is less overhead to recover for design and bleeding layouts.
Unlike offset litho, a digital press often needs very few sheets of paper in the set-up process, which again is a clear saving that can be passed on to the customer. This means that on short runs digital can be a very cost-effective way of producing a job.
However, as the quantity increases, digital printing eventually becomes more expensive than litho due to the slower running speed and the “click charges” levied by the manufacturer of the press.
The precise point at which litho becomes cheaper depends on a number of factors within the specification of the job, primarily document size and pagination.
The graphs on this page illustrate the cross-over point for three projects and it can be seen that the quantity at which this occurs varies from 350 copies for a 8pp A4 to 1000 copies for 2pp A4.
Purbrooks are happy to advise on the most appropriate process for a particular project and can quote for both litho and digital to assist clients in deciding on the balance between quality, speed and price.
Purbrooks point out that it is important that the quality of finishing should be identical whatever the printing process as this will differentiate some printers’ finished digital printing from that of their competitors.
Reproduced and based on an article by kind permission of Martin Stern
Purbrooks.
Gresham Way, Wimbledon Park
London SW19 8ED
T: 020 8944 3200 F: 020 8944 3237
e: martin@purbrooks.co.uk
w: www.purbrooks.co.uk
There are two main reasons for choosing to print digitally: speed of turnaround and low cost on short runs.
The quick turnaround of digital print is due to the fact that the ink on toner-based machines dries instantly, even on uncoated stocks, so there is no delay in the printing process.
It is always best practice to have a hard copy proof, to ensure all colours are correct, and there are no problems in the PDF or using your chosen printing substrate or method.
This is because:
• the shade, colour, texture and reflection of paper, card, plastic, etc. varies with batches and processes.
• as toner/ink is Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black, (CMYK) and uses reflective light and some images on paper, card, plastic, etc. may limit contrast and look flat, dull or enhance contrast, colour or brilliance.
• as a screen view is projected light in Red, Green & Blue (RGB).
• A PDF may not have all the fonts embedded in the file, so the software may substitute another font.
The short run nature of digital jobs does allow the quicker option of approving just a PDF before printing, further speeding up the turnaround time, but is very hard to match a screen view with a hardcopy print view.
A digital press does not use printing plates and there is a much smaller machine make-ready time to charge out or recover.
Some software systems like Quite Imposing http://www.quite.com/imposing/ can cut down studio time for page imposition. This can be done on the fly or with templates, so there is less overhead to recover for design and bleeding layouts.
Unlike offset litho, a digital press often needs very few sheets of paper in the set-up process, which again is a clear saving that can be passed on to the customer. This means that on short runs digital can be a very cost-effective way of producing a job.
However, as the quantity increases, digital printing eventually becomes more expensive than litho due to the slower running speed and the “click charges” levied by the manufacturer of the press.
The precise point at which litho becomes cheaper depends on a number of factors within the specification of the job, primarily document size and pagination.
The graphs on this page illustrate the cross-over point for three projects and it can be seen that the quantity at which this occurs varies from 350 copies for a 8pp A4 to 1000 copies for 2pp A4.
Purbrooks are happy to advise on the most appropriate process for a particular project and can quote for both litho and digital to assist clients in deciding on the balance between quality, speed and price.
Purbrooks point out that it is important that the quality of finishing should be identical whatever the printing process as this will differentiate some printers’ finished digital printing from that of their competitors.
Reproduced and based on an article by kind permission of Martin Stern
Purbrooks.
Gresham Way, Wimbledon Park
London SW19 8ED
T: 020 8944 3200 F: 020 8944 3237
e: martin@purbrooks.co.uk
w: www.purbrooks.co.uk
Friday, 17 February 2012
New KM Bizhub 36 & 42 A4 mono MFD for occasional A3 use
I think this is a great idea. Most of us print, copy fax and scan A4, so to have an A4 machine for most day-t-day business use, but to have the added facility of A3 for occasional use via the paper bypass tray is brilliant so, the footprint of the machine can be kept small and the speed fast, with a low cost of ownership and whole-life running costs
Konica Minolta Business Solutions (UK) announce the launch of two new A4, 36 and 42 ppm mono multifunctional devices (MFDs) offering all the feature rich functionality of the company’s award winning bizhub range, including print, colour scanning, copy and optional fax. For organisations requiring occasional A3 output the new multifunctional devices provide A3 print output via the bypass tray.
Technology Highlights
Print, copy, colour scan, plus optional fax and A3 capabilities; up to 36 and 42 pages/min.
Konica Minolta technologies
Simitri HD polymerised toner, Emperon print controller and PageScope applications.
Optional finishing capabilities
Embedded finisher for corner and 2-point stapling.
Eco-friendly
Minimised environmental impact with standard duplex and Simitri HD toner with biomass; Blue Angel and Energy Star certified.
A3 future proof
The A4 MFD device is capability of printing and copying A4 via the internal paper trays, but can take A3 paper via the bypass tray to save space
Konica Minolta Business Solutions (UK) announce the launch of two new A4, 36 and 42 ppm mono multifunctional devices (MFDs) offering all the feature rich functionality of the company’s award winning bizhub range, including print, colour scanning, copy and optional fax. For organisations requiring occasional A3 output the new multifunctional devices provide A3 print output via the bypass tray.
Technology Highlights
Print, copy, colour scan, plus optional fax and A3 capabilities; up to 36 and 42 pages/min.
Konica Minolta technologies
Simitri HD polymerised toner, Emperon print controller and PageScope applications.
Optional finishing capabilities
Embedded finisher for corner and 2-point stapling.
Eco-friendly
Minimised environmental impact with standard duplex and Simitri HD toner with biomass; Blue Angel and Energy Star certified.
A3 future proof
The A4 MFD device is capability of printing and copying A4 via the internal paper trays, but can take A3 paper via the bypass tray to save space
GreenPrint Enterprise Products
Powerful Tools to Measure & Reduce Enterprise Print Costs
Managing print consumption in an enterprise environment represents a huge savings opportunity. But the effort can be tricky. Different departments and users have different print habits and needs. Different print devices have different capabilities and cost profiles. GreenPrint offers a suite of software solutions that enable you to tackle print consumption with a phased, measurable and verifiable approach for each unique part of your organization.
GreenPrint Analytics GreenPrint Advisor GreenPrint preView+
GreenPrint Analytics is a powerful tool that measures print volume for both on- and off-network printers, identifies cost savings opportunities and enables better print management over time. GreenPrint Advisor uses a simple color coding system to help your end-users identify low cost printer options. Advisor then gently guides them to shift print volume to those devices whenever possible. GreenPrint preView+ is a unique interactive print preview feature that helps your end-users identify and eliminate print waste before it is printed, dramatically reducing print volume and associated costs!
Learn More
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: GreenPrint Analytics is offered as a stand-alone product offering or as part of a bundle with GreenPrint Advisor and GreenPrint preView+.
GreenPrint Analytics
Powerful Reporting Provides the Foundation for Enterprise Print Savings
A natural first step…GreenPrint Analytics is a powerful print measurement and analysis tool that can help your organization track print consumption of both on and off-network printers, identify immediate cost savings opportunities and enable you to more efficiently manage your print operations over time. Analytics is offered as a stand alone product offering or as part of a bundle with GreenPrint's other product modules.
Easy to Deploy, Non-Disruptive and Comprehensive
•Software application can be centrally distributed to all computers in your organization
•Completely invisible to end users – no employee interaction is required
•Turnkey, web-hosted data service – no servers to provision, no databases to manage
•Analytics is highly secure – via Amazon's EC2/S3 hosting service
•Data on demand – simply log in to your secure data server to view print data real time
Actionable, Accurate and Detailed Data
PRINT VOLUME REPORTS
•Total pages printed (includes networked and locally connected devices)
•Highest volume users
•Applications printed most/least
•Reports for departments, groups and/or users
PRINTER INVENTORY REPORTS
•Complete inventory of active printers
•Printers used most/least
•Identification of costly printers (i.e., USB devices)
•Searchable database (e.g., by model or device type)
SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES
•Actionable print data enables savings of up to 30%
•Reports on volume printed to costly printers
•Shift volume from costly printers to lower cost devices
•Eliminate costly or unnecessary printers
Start with Analytics…Then You Have Upgrade Options!
•GUIDE users to low cost printers with GreenPrint Advisor
•OPTIMIZE savings by reducing print waste with GreenPrint preView+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GreenPrint Advisor
Guide Users to Your Lowest Cost Printers
Have you ever asked your employees to print to low cost printers, only to find that a week or two later they are back to their old bad habits? GreenPrint is well aware of this challenge, and has addressed this issue with the introduction of GreenPrint Advisor.
Advisor is a low touch, intuitive interface that quickly GUIDES users to your lowest cost or most desirable printers (prior to printing) with communication that is as easy to understand as a traffic light:
•Green is a good low cost printer to use
•Yellow might not be the best printer choice
•Red is a high cost printer that should only be used if business conditions dictate
Advisor Provides an Array of Smart Print Options
Advisor is fast and requires minimal user interaction. Advisor’s key benefits include:
•Drives awareness of print costs
•Saves $$/££ by guiding users to low cost printers
•Reinforces good print habits
•Provides optional path to waste reduction through preView+
•Provides opportunity to electronically archive documents
Full Integration with GreenPrint Analytics and preView+
Advisor is an option that is fully integrated with GreenPrint Analytics. Print per page cost data is imported into Advisor from the administrative console, and allows you to easily group printers by similar cost attributes into the Green, Yellow, and Red categories described above. Analytics accurately tracks and measures print volume and associated costs for each of the color coded categories. Reports can be generated for your entire organization, for groups or departments, or even for individual users.
Advisor also provides a simple, optional path for users to interact with GreenPrint preView+, which allows users to identify print waste and eliminate it BEFORE it goes to the printer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GreenPrint preView+
Interactive Preview Helps Eliminate Print Waste & Reduce Volume
PreView+ Highlights
•Easy, intuitive user interface
•Helps users highlight and eliminate unnecessary pages, images and text
•One click to duplex, PDF or print in B&W
•Visibly presents print costs for each print job
•Visibly presents savings as users eliminate unwanted pages
•Provides detailed individual print reports that track costs and savings over time
•All individual data is aggregated by GreenPrint Analytics
Eliminating wasted pages at the printer can only be done by providing the right tool at the PC. After all, each of us is responsible for creating our own print jobs and ultimately for sending them to the printer. All too often, those print jobs have unnecessary content ranging from whole pages to select images or pieces of text. Frequently, we aren’t even aware that the waste is present, like printing from the internet and getting that annoying extra page with just a url or a few lines of unnecessary text. But just as frequently, we print unnecessary content because we are in a hurry, because there’s no good way to get rid of stuff we don’t need, or simply because we’re lazy. Whatever the reasons for print waste, one thing is certain: your organization is paying for it, and so is the environment.
preView+ Helps Users Deal with their Own Print Waste
GreenPrint preView+ is an option that helps your end-users identify and eliminate print waste before it is printed, dramatically reducing print volume and associated costs! preView+ makes it fast and easy for your employees to see what they are about to print, confirm that it is what they want, and to quickly eliminate any unwanted or unnecessary content. preView+ is an optional tool that users invoke how and when they see fit. However, GreenPrint Analytics will track how much your users are saving, enabling you to see who is doing a good job of managing their printing, as well as to see those who still have room for improvement.
PreView+ Provides GreenPrint not only provides the tools to help your end users reduce print waste, but preView+ also provides instant print data so that each person in your organization can understand how much they have printed, how much they have saved, and the corresponding $$/££ and environmental costs. This data helps people appreciate that printing is an expensive cost center for your company and encourages them to their part to be as efficient as possible.
See: http://www.printgreener.com/1/greenprint-enterprise
Managing print consumption in an enterprise environment represents a huge savings opportunity. But the effort can be tricky. Different departments and users have different print habits and needs. Different print devices have different capabilities and cost profiles. GreenPrint offers a suite of software solutions that enable you to tackle print consumption with a phased, measurable and verifiable approach for each unique part of your organization.
GreenPrint Analytics GreenPrint Advisor GreenPrint preView+
GreenPrint Analytics is a powerful tool that measures print volume for both on- and off-network printers, identifies cost savings opportunities and enables better print management over time. GreenPrint Advisor uses a simple color coding system to help your end-users identify low cost printer options. Advisor then gently guides them to shift print volume to those devices whenever possible. GreenPrint preView+ is a unique interactive print preview feature that helps your end-users identify and eliminate print waste before it is printed, dramatically reducing print volume and associated costs!
Learn More
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: GreenPrint Analytics is offered as a stand-alone product offering or as part of a bundle with GreenPrint Advisor and GreenPrint preView+.
GreenPrint Analytics
Powerful Reporting Provides the Foundation for Enterprise Print Savings
A natural first step…GreenPrint Analytics is a powerful print measurement and analysis tool that can help your organization track print consumption of both on and off-network printers, identify immediate cost savings opportunities and enable you to more efficiently manage your print operations over time. Analytics is offered as a stand alone product offering or as part of a bundle with GreenPrint's other product modules.
Easy to Deploy, Non-Disruptive and Comprehensive
•Software application can be centrally distributed to all computers in your organization
•Completely invisible to end users – no employee interaction is required
•Turnkey, web-hosted data service – no servers to provision, no databases to manage
•Analytics is highly secure – via Amazon's EC2/S3 hosting service
•Data on demand – simply log in to your secure data server to view print data real time
Actionable, Accurate and Detailed Data
PRINT VOLUME REPORTS
•Total pages printed (includes networked and locally connected devices)
•Highest volume users
•Applications printed most/least
•Reports for departments, groups and/or users
PRINTER INVENTORY REPORTS
•Complete inventory of active printers
•Printers used most/least
•Identification of costly printers (i.e., USB devices)
•Searchable database (e.g., by model or device type)
SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES
•Actionable print data enables savings of up to 30%
•Reports on volume printed to costly printers
•Shift volume from costly printers to lower cost devices
•Eliminate costly or unnecessary printers
Start with Analytics…Then You Have Upgrade Options!
•GUIDE users to low cost printers with GreenPrint Advisor
•OPTIMIZE savings by reducing print waste with GreenPrint preView+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GreenPrint Advisor
Guide Users to Your Lowest Cost Printers
Have you ever asked your employees to print to low cost printers, only to find that a week or two later they are back to their old bad habits? GreenPrint is well aware of this challenge, and has addressed this issue with the introduction of GreenPrint Advisor.
Advisor is a low touch, intuitive interface that quickly GUIDES users to your lowest cost or most desirable printers (prior to printing) with communication that is as easy to understand as a traffic light:
•Green is a good low cost printer to use
•Yellow might not be the best printer choice
•Red is a high cost printer that should only be used if business conditions dictate
Advisor Provides an Array of Smart Print Options
Advisor is fast and requires minimal user interaction. Advisor’s key benefits include:
•Drives awareness of print costs
•Saves $$/££ by guiding users to low cost printers
•Reinforces good print habits
•Provides optional path to waste reduction through preView+
•Provides opportunity to electronically archive documents
Full Integration with GreenPrint Analytics and preView+
Advisor is an option that is fully integrated with GreenPrint Analytics. Print per page cost data is imported into Advisor from the administrative console, and allows you to easily group printers by similar cost attributes into the Green, Yellow, and Red categories described above. Analytics accurately tracks and measures print volume and associated costs for each of the color coded categories. Reports can be generated for your entire organization, for groups or departments, or even for individual users.
Advisor also provides a simple, optional path for users to interact with GreenPrint preView+, which allows users to identify print waste and eliminate it BEFORE it goes to the printer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GreenPrint preView+
Interactive Preview Helps Eliminate Print Waste & Reduce Volume
PreView+ Highlights
•Easy, intuitive user interface
•Helps users highlight and eliminate unnecessary pages, images and text
•One click to duplex, PDF or print in B&W
•Visibly presents print costs for each print job
•Visibly presents savings as users eliminate unwanted pages
•Provides detailed individual print reports that track costs and savings over time
•All individual data is aggregated by GreenPrint Analytics
Eliminating wasted pages at the printer can only be done by providing the right tool at the PC. After all, each of us is responsible for creating our own print jobs and ultimately for sending them to the printer. All too often, those print jobs have unnecessary content ranging from whole pages to select images or pieces of text. Frequently, we aren’t even aware that the waste is present, like printing from the internet and getting that annoying extra page with just a url or a few lines of unnecessary text. But just as frequently, we print unnecessary content because we are in a hurry, because there’s no good way to get rid of stuff we don’t need, or simply because we’re lazy. Whatever the reasons for print waste, one thing is certain: your organization is paying for it, and so is the environment.
preView+ Helps Users Deal with their Own Print Waste
GreenPrint preView+ is an option that helps your end-users identify and eliminate print waste before it is printed, dramatically reducing print volume and associated costs! preView+ makes it fast and easy for your employees to see what they are about to print, confirm that it is what they want, and to quickly eliminate any unwanted or unnecessary content. preView+ is an optional tool that users invoke how and when they see fit. However, GreenPrint Analytics will track how much your users are saving, enabling you to see who is doing a good job of managing their printing, as well as to see those who still have room for improvement.
PreView+ Provides GreenPrint not only provides the tools to help your end users reduce print waste, but preView+ also provides instant print data so that each person in your organization can understand how much they have printed, how much they have saved, and the corresponding $$/££ and environmental costs. This data helps people appreciate that printing is an expensive cost center for your company and encourages them to their part to be as efficient as possible.
See: http://www.printgreener.com/1/greenprint-enterprise
Thursday, 16 February 2012
Rethinking Printing - Kyocera Environmental Survey 2011
Key Stats Summary
• 71% of office workers consider themselves environmentally conscious
• 14% of workers have increased the amount of printing they do in the last year
• Workers print 6,000 sheets a year on average, of which 3,720 are wasted or unnecessary
• Only 25% of companies have a formal, written print policy
• 21% of IT time is spent dealing with printer issues
• 62% have audited their print services in the past year
• Nearly half (48%) of workers claim to have no knowledge of their companies’ carbon offset policy
Is this finally the dawn of the paperless office?
Kyocera environmental survey finds major reductions in print volumes for the first time
Kyocera's annual environmental survey has this year discovered a significant drop in the number pages office-based workers print each year. Since the company first carried out the survey in its current form in 2007, the average number of pages printed by an office based worker has remained static at 40 sheets per day, equating to 10,000 sheets per year. In 2011 the average number of pages printed per year has dropped by 40% to 6000. This dramatic and sudden decrease could signal that, after many false starts, the long-heralded dawn of the paperless office is finally at hand.
Despite this drop in the number of pages printed, the proportion that are "wasted" each year has remained static at 66%. "Wasted" pages include those that could have been printed double-sided, those printed in error, and those printed but never collected from the device.
Commenting on the trends, Tracey Rawling Church, Director of Brand and Reputation at Kyocera Mita UK said: "This significant drop in print volumes indicates a sea-change in UK business. Anecdotally there appears to be far more confidence in mobile devices and electronic forms, and a willingness to rely on electronic information rather than having a piece of paper to hand. The proportion of wasted prints remains high, however, and the research showed that 72% of respondents felt that responsibility for reducing print volumes lies with the individual, with 44% admitting that they could print less than they currently do. This indicates a lack of awareness of the possibilities of automating reductions in print volumes by setting duplex functions as standard and applying print policy software."
Economic effects
For the second consecutive year it seems that the economic situation has had a neutral or positive effect on companies' environmental initiatives, with 45% of respondents stating that the economic downturn had either had no effect on their green plans, or had actually increased the focus on becoming more environmentally responsible and efficient.
Procurement
This year Kyocera Mita delved more deeply into the attitudes of procurement professionals towards "green" purchasing. The responses showed that despite 71% of organisations stating that they have a green procurement policy, only 1 in 4 procurement managers would reject a potential supplier based on failure to meet green criteria. The survey also showed that while a 75% of organisations ask questions about a supplier’s environmental credentials at the tender stage, only 18% carry out subsequent audits on suppliers following the tender award. Unsurprisingly, cost reduction remains the highest priority for 89% of procurement managers, with only 52% reporting a similar level of concern for environmental issues.
Tracey Rawling Church comments: “There seems to be a disconnect between policy and the day-to-day reality of purchasing. In my experience, procurement managers are targeted and rewarded on the basis of the cost savings that they achieve, so it’s not surprising that focus drifts away from a supplier’s environmental credentials.”
82% of respondents felt that waste reduction would be the primary benefit of taking environmental issues into account when selecting goods and services, while 80% believed that energy efficiency would improve. Only 46% anticipated that there would be lower costs.
Conclusions
Business technology is a major area of environmental concern. Too often, however, environmental action in the workplace take a back seat to concerns seen as more immediate, such as short-term cost savings. The current economic situation, which has given rise to a renewed emphasis on longer-term savings, has motivated increased emphasis on efficiency and related green concerns. Obstacles to more responsible green action in the workplace remain, however. These include ingrained habits (such as single-side printing and assigning employees their own printers), short-term planning (such as examining supplier efficiency at tender, but not after), and lack of joined-up action (such as not communicating existent offset schemes to environmentally-concerned employees). All of these are part of a larger, overarching issue: businesses are still not fully connecting their day-to-day green concerns to their long-term plans for business success.
This is particularly striking in the technological environment of 2011, in which the efficiency and sustainability benefits of green choices bring ever-clearer benefits to the bottom line. Businesses who ‘think green’ when making technology and policy choices have the opportunity to make a profit both for themselves and for the environment. In order to fully capitalise on the opportunity for green technology success, the most forward-looking businesses need to rethink their established ways of doing things. They need to:
• Consider centrally-managed policy change to combat habitual waste and actively promote more efficient alternatives. Consistency across the business, which comes from central management decisions, will insure that no ‘pockets of bad practice’ remain, and that the entire business benefits from the best green initiatives.
• Monitor their actions on an ongoing basis, to make sure that standards are being met, and that the business receives maximum benefits. This ongoing engagement includes technology purchases (which should be audited regularly) and consideration of other, possibly more efficient solutions, such as externally managed printing services and the cloud.
• Communicate across the business about what is being done, why it is being done, and how it could be done better. Businesses need to capitalise on the reservoirs of green concern and engagement within their business. They need to make sure that employees are aware of initiatives and able to contribute ideas for improvement, so that innovation can come from all levels.
Success in 2012 and beyond is about going beyond short-term efficiency measures and moving toward a truly green model of business technology. In the most innovative companies, the green concerns of management and staff are harnessed into a continual effort toward innovation. With the entire organisation engaged in continual improvement, both the bottom line and the environment benefit.
Rethinking Printing
Kyocera Environmental Survey 2011
Full report
http://www.kyoceramita.co.uk/index/kyocera_mita_environmental.-contextmargin-62577-File.cpsdownload.tmp/Executive%20Summary%20and%20Analysis.pdf
Rethinking Printing
Kyocera Environmental Survey 2011
PowerPoint
http://www.kyoceramita.co.uk/index/kyocera_mita_environmental.-contextmargin-27202-File.cpsdownload.tmp/Environmental%20Findings%202011%20FINAL.pdf
Rethinking Printing
Kyocera Environmental Survey 2011
Video
http://www.kyoceramita.co.uk/index/kyocera_mita_environmental.html
• 71% of office workers consider themselves environmentally conscious
• 14% of workers have increased the amount of printing they do in the last year
• Workers print 6,000 sheets a year on average, of which 3,720 are wasted or unnecessary
• Only 25% of companies have a formal, written print policy
• 21% of IT time is spent dealing with printer issues
• 62% have audited their print services in the past year
• Nearly half (48%) of workers claim to have no knowledge of their companies’ carbon offset policy
Is this finally the dawn of the paperless office?
Kyocera environmental survey finds major reductions in print volumes for the first time
Kyocera's annual environmental survey has this year discovered a significant drop in the number pages office-based workers print each year. Since the company first carried out the survey in its current form in 2007, the average number of pages printed by an office based worker has remained static at 40 sheets per day, equating to 10,000 sheets per year. In 2011 the average number of pages printed per year has dropped by 40% to 6000. This dramatic and sudden decrease could signal that, after many false starts, the long-heralded dawn of the paperless office is finally at hand.
Despite this drop in the number of pages printed, the proportion that are "wasted" each year has remained static at 66%. "Wasted" pages include those that could have been printed double-sided, those printed in error, and those printed but never collected from the device.
Commenting on the trends, Tracey Rawling Church, Director of Brand and Reputation at Kyocera Mita UK said: "This significant drop in print volumes indicates a sea-change in UK business. Anecdotally there appears to be far more confidence in mobile devices and electronic forms, and a willingness to rely on electronic information rather than having a piece of paper to hand. The proportion of wasted prints remains high, however, and the research showed that 72% of respondents felt that responsibility for reducing print volumes lies with the individual, with 44% admitting that they could print less than they currently do. This indicates a lack of awareness of the possibilities of automating reductions in print volumes by setting duplex functions as standard and applying print policy software."
Economic effects
For the second consecutive year it seems that the economic situation has had a neutral or positive effect on companies' environmental initiatives, with 45% of respondents stating that the economic downturn had either had no effect on their green plans, or had actually increased the focus on becoming more environmentally responsible and efficient.
Procurement
This year Kyocera Mita delved more deeply into the attitudes of procurement professionals towards "green" purchasing. The responses showed that despite 71% of organisations stating that they have a green procurement policy, only 1 in 4 procurement managers would reject a potential supplier based on failure to meet green criteria. The survey also showed that while a 75% of organisations ask questions about a supplier’s environmental credentials at the tender stage, only 18% carry out subsequent audits on suppliers following the tender award. Unsurprisingly, cost reduction remains the highest priority for 89% of procurement managers, with only 52% reporting a similar level of concern for environmental issues.
Tracey Rawling Church comments: “There seems to be a disconnect between policy and the day-to-day reality of purchasing. In my experience, procurement managers are targeted and rewarded on the basis of the cost savings that they achieve, so it’s not surprising that focus drifts away from a supplier’s environmental credentials.”
82% of respondents felt that waste reduction would be the primary benefit of taking environmental issues into account when selecting goods and services, while 80% believed that energy efficiency would improve. Only 46% anticipated that there would be lower costs.
Conclusions
Business technology is a major area of environmental concern. Too often, however, environmental action in the workplace take a back seat to concerns seen as more immediate, such as short-term cost savings. The current economic situation, which has given rise to a renewed emphasis on longer-term savings, has motivated increased emphasis on efficiency and related green concerns. Obstacles to more responsible green action in the workplace remain, however. These include ingrained habits (such as single-side printing and assigning employees their own printers), short-term planning (such as examining supplier efficiency at tender, but not after), and lack of joined-up action (such as not communicating existent offset schemes to environmentally-concerned employees). All of these are part of a larger, overarching issue: businesses are still not fully connecting their day-to-day green concerns to their long-term plans for business success.
This is particularly striking in the technological environment of 2011, in which the efficiency and sustainability benefits of green choices bring ever-clearer benefits to the bottom line. Businesses who ‘think green’ when making technology and policy choices have the opportunity to make a profit both for themselves and for the environment. In order to fully capitalise on the opportunity for green technology success, the most forward-looking businesses need to rethink their established ways of doing things. They need to:
• Consider centrally-managed policy change to combat habitual waste and actively promote more efficient alternatives. Consistency across the business, which comes from central management decisions, will insure that no ‘pockets of bad practice’ remain, and that the entire business benefits from the best green initiatives.
• Monitor their actions on an ongoing basis, to make sure that standards are being met, and that the business receives maximum benefits. This ongoing engagement includes technology purchases (which should be audited regularly) and consideration of other, possibly more efficient solutions, such as externally managed printing services and the cloud.
• Communicate across the business about what is being done, why it is being done, and how it could be done better. Businesses need to capitalise on the reservoirs of green concern and engagement within their business. They need to make sure that employees are aware of initiatives and able to contribute ideas for improvement, so that innovation can come from all levels.
Success in 2012 and beyond is about going beyond short-term efficiency measures and moving toward a truly green model of business technology. In the most innovative companies, the green concerns of management and staff are harnessed into a continual effort toward innovation. With the entire organisation engaged in continual improvement, both the bottom line and the environment benefit.
Rethinking Printing
Kyocera Environmental Survey 2011
Full report
http://www.kyoceramita.co.uk/index/kyocera_mita_environmental.-contextmargin-62577-File.cpsdownload.tmp/Executive%20Summary%20and%20Analysis.pdf
Rethinking Printing
Kyocera Environmental Survey 2011
PowerPoint
http://www.kyoceramita.co.uk/index/kyocera_mita_environmental.-contextmargin-27202-File.cpsdownload.tmp/Environmental%20Findings%202011%20FINAL.pdf
Rethinking Printing
Kyocera Environmental Survey 2011
Video
http://www.kyoceramita.co.uk/index/kyocera_mita_environmental.html
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
The Paper Free Office - dream or reality?
AIIM Market Intelligence undertook a report on The Paper Free Office between November 30th, 2011, and January 3rd, 2012.
477 individual members took the survey and below are the key findings, conclusions and recommendations.
The aiim research support the long held belief that even when data is born digital and used in a digital environment, it is often produced as a paper version in use and transit for adding other documents or information.
This paper version document of the digital data may be on hardcopy to facilitate an original paper based business process. That document will require physical, handing to acquire a signature or other hardcopy attachment, such as a photograph, photocopy of qualification or copy of identification document. All of these business processes can be performed digital. In most cases, the hardcopy document is then scanned as an image (without indexing metadata) to become a new digital copy of the original data with added information. In most cases, the paper based hardcopy is kept on-site and filed for future reference, which is a very inefficient business process.
Key Findings
• There is less paper floating around the office – especially in the biggest organizations. The consumption of paper and the number of photocopies is decreasing in 35% of organizations, whereas it is increasing in 32%. In the largest organizations, the net proportion of respondents posting a decrease is 15%.
• Electronic-only filing would halve the storage space needed for paper in 5 years. The average proportion of office space taken up by paper is now 15.3%, and it would drop to 7.4% with an all-electronic filing policy, a saving of nearly 8% in overall office costs.
• On average, 45% of documents that are scanned are 100% “born digital” – just as they came from the printer. And many of the rest would be all-digital if not for the added signatures.
• 77% of invoices that arrive as PDF attachments get printed. 31% of faxed invoices get printed and scanned back in. On average, 30% of invoices arrive as PDF attachments, and 15% as faxes.
• 41% of organizations in the survey are using some form of digital-mailroom, either as a centralized operation or distributed at branch offices. 4% are outsourced.
• 20% of organizations scan half or more of their inbound mail at or before entry. A further 20% are more likely to scan at the point-of-process, and 29% scan-to-archive after the process.
• Improved sharability and searchability is the biggest driver for investment in scanning and capture. Followed by improved productivity and reduced storage space.
• On average, respondents using scanning and capture consider that it improves the speed of response to customers, suppliers, citizens or staff by 6-times or more. 70% estimate an improvement of at least 3-times, and nearly a third (29%) see an improvement of 10-times or more.
• 42% of users have achieved a payback period of 12 months or less from their scanning and capture investments. 57% are posting a payback of 18-months or less.
• A net of 13% of respondents plan to increase their use of bureaus or document process outsource (DPO), particularly in Europe (net 21%). But only a net of 1% will be increasing their offshore activities.
• 38% of respondents have employees equipped to use portable devices to capture documents or forms when not at their desks. Over 14% are using portable scanners for forms and supporting documents. 6% are using smartphones or tablets, including 4% who use OCR to capture data at the device.
• Over half of those using portable devices capture signatures, either by scanning (30%), stylus (11%) or using a digital signature app (21%).
• Speed of data availability and keeping paper out of the process are given as the biggest advantages of mobile capture, followed by better data accuracy and fewer lost or incomplete forms.
• 12% of respondents are committed to a strategy of cloud deployment of capture – rising to 20% of the largest organizations. 18% overall have firmly decided against it and 39% are waiting for a company decision on cloud in general (27%), or capture specifically (12%).
• Spending predictions indicate a considerable increase in spend on capture software, including mobile capture and as a front-end to SharePoint. A net of 23% of responding organizations indicate increased spend for the next 12 months. Spend on scanners is set to be stable, while spend on outsourcing is set to decrease.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Paper-free, paper-less, less-paper…? Yes, it seems that some progress is being made, particularly in larger organizations. We looked at the physical space savings that this can produce, and an all-electronic filing policy could save nearly 8% of office space within 5 years. And there are, of course, environmental benefits associated with less paper, less photocopying and less printing.
But the big reason to head paper off at the door is to prevent it clogging up processes and to mobilize its content. Improved access and sharability to other staff, faster response to customers, and better process productivity are the three big gains. In particular, our respondents estimated that on average their use of scanning and capture improved the speed of response to customers, suppliers, citizens or staff by 6 times or more – a dramatic improvement to competitively in a world that is only too ready to publicize poor service. Funnelling incoming mail through a digital mailroom enhances this benefit, ensuring that all customer or supplier correspondence is immediately available to help desks, sales staff and teleworkers - and this concept lends itself to both in-house and outsourced provision.
Overall we saw a return on investment of 18 months or less for over half of our respondents.
We also found many ways in which paper leaks back into the office. Apart from the inevitable personal printing of emails, we found procedural shortcomings where PDF and faxed invoices are printed out – and then sometimes scanned in again; where scanning takes place at the end of the process rather than at the beginning; where documents are photocopied before scanning; and where documents that have been successfully scanned are stored in the office rather than being destroyed, or at least, warehoused.
Finally, we took a glimpse at the impact of the explosion in mobile devices and their increasing capability to scan and capture paper forms, or to provide direct data input to back-office processes.
Recommendations
• Audit your processes to see where paper slows throughput, adds process steps, or restricts transparency and reporting.
• In particular, examine your customer (or supplier or staff) response mechanisms to see if physical mailings or paper processing are slowing things down, restricting visibility, or paralleling electronic communications paths.
• Look at how physical handling of incoming mail site-by-site might better be centralized, processed in higher volume, and distributed electronically.
• If you are already using scanning, consider how much “closer to the door” you could be going electronic, and how that might transform who does the subsequent processing and where they might be located.
• Evaluate the latest technology for capturing data from forms and invoices, and look to process a higher proportion of your documents automatically.
• Consider using a bureau or DPO, especially if you are concerned about capital outlay, fluctuating volumes and overall risk. Don’t assume that basic DPO will be cheaper, but ensure that they add value by taking on as much of the down-stream processing as possible.
• Aim to scan documents or capture data as close to the source as possible – in the branch office, on the shop floor, in the field or at the customer’s premises.
• Brainstorm how the capabilities of modern mobile devices – portable scanners, smartphones, tablets and specialist devices – could transform your processes by eliminating elapsed time, lost forms, poor data, and rekeying.
• Pick just one of these areas and test out the business case. Chances are it will show a good enough return on its own, with other applications and benefits enhancing the potential return.
The survey was taken using a web-based tool by 477 individual members of the AIIM community between November 30th, 2011, and January 3rd, 2012. Invitations to take the survey were sent via e-mail to a selection of the 65,000 AIIM community members.
Survey demographics can be found in Appendix A. Graphs throughout the report exclude responses from organizations with less than 10 employees and suppliers of ECM products or services, taking the number of respondents to 395.
Full report http://www.aiim.org/pdfdocuments/IW_Paper-free-Capture_2012.pdf
Friday, 10 February 2012
Confidential Data is breached via print devices and MFP’s.
A CBS news story that highlights just how easily and widely speared that Confidential Data is breached via print devices and MFP’s. This emphasise the need for a clear enterprise document management system, with cradle to grave, whole-life management business process.
Thursday, 9 February 2012
HP Web jetadmin 10.2 Video
HP Web jetadmin is a FREE powerful web-based print management that’s fast, easy, and reliable. Install, configure, troubleshoot, and manage both HP and non-HP networked print devices. New features include advanced configuration and maintenance capabilities and more robust alerting and reporting functions. Improve productivity and reduce operation costs with an award-winning, industry-leading print management solution. HP Web Jetadmin 10.2 delivers improvements in speed, ease of use, and reliability. Retain your existing HP Web Jetadmin configuration with automated, built in backup and restore features.
http://h20331.www2.hp.com/hpsub/cache/332262-0-0-225-121.html
http://h20331.www2.hp.com/hpsub/cache/332262-0-0-225-121.html
Monday, 6 February 2012
Multi-Channel Document Output Management (White Paper)
I think this white paper on Multi-Channel Document Output Management is very interesting as it clearly shows the issues of data use and reuse in output devices. However, they could have made more of an issues for the data reuse and the value of intellectual Property Rights Management. (IPRM)
White paper http://www.xenos.com/xe/download/wp-paper/MIWP-Multi-Channel-Output-Xenos-Actuate.pdf
White paper http://www.xenos.com/xe/download/wp-paper/MIWP-Multi-Channel-Output-Xenos-Actuate.pdf
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
Solid Ink Printing Sustainability Advantages: Xerox
Deb Koehler, director of sustainability at Xerox, explains the sustainability advantages of solid ink printers vs. traditional laser printers. Deb addresses the impacts of waste reduction on environmental concerns such as carbon footprint, energy conservation and environmentally friendly manufacturing that Xerox practices, indicated by the Energy Star certification on various printers
Canon extends uniFLOW to mobile devices
Canon Europe is announcing the launch of uniFLOW version 5.1, extending the industry's first single platform to manage print and scanning processes to mobile devices including smartphones, tablets and netbooks.
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
Do they hold the key to printing and copying sustainability?
Do suppliers hold the key to sustainable development management information in printing and photocopying for an organisation?
Logically if suppliers of printing management systems (like Pcounter, Uniflow, papercut, etc.), were to count power consumption (uptime, running and standby) for , every machine and for every image produced and sheet of paper, used they could assign a carbon value to each factor* and this would show the whole life carbon footprint of the machine and the amount of paper used.
These factors* could be assigned a cost and from that a cost of ownership and idea if costs are getting higher or lower over time, so if the machine is becoming more or less efficient and effective.
This would clearly show the paper purchased, that is actually used by that printing system and the leakage.
Then we will be able to show the efficiency, actual paper use, by the printing system, carbon savings and the leakage of paper that is used on other printers.
Even if we just put in the paper as A4 & A3 80gsm white paper, we would all get a much clearer picture of printing across our organisations and times of peak demand.
Friday, 16 December 2011
HEIST Award Nomination for “Build Your Own Prospectus” Innovation
The innovative personalised prospectus jointly developed by the Digital Media Team and Print Services, of the University of East London’s Corporate Marketing; and on-demand digital print experts KnowledgePoint has already scooped two major national industry awards.
The project has been further nominated as a finalist for a prestigious HEIST Award – the premier event for Higher Education Marketing. It is being considered for the“Best use of Innovation and Creative Thinking” award. The judges will announce the awards at The Queens Hotel in Leeds on 26th May 2011.
Last year, at a gala event on the 11th of November 2010, it received a medal at the prestigious UK IT Industry Awards 2010, the Project Excellence Awards category for ‘Revolutionising Variable Data Print in the Education Sector’.
A week later on the 17th of November UEL’s personal prospectus building toolkit then took the Digital Printer Awards 2010 for its outstanding use of digital printing technology.
UEL’s ‘Build Your Own Prospectus’ system creates and sends a personalised printed prospectus to potential students based on their choices. As the personal prospectus is self-selected by the user it is naturally more relevant, making it a far more effective marketing tool.
The system also provides a profile for further communication and future evidence-based marketing, whilst also being greener and more cost effective.
“Jonathan Stephenson, Head of Digital Media at UEL, said: “These awards confirm our leading position in the development of user-focused marketing solutions based on an understanding of the expectations and objectives of the online prospect, linked to an on-demand digital print output.”
“The outcome is exactly what the potential customer wants. It is their own prospectus in every sense and we are finding that their further actions towards applying to study with us are much higher as a result than are obtained from more traditional approaches.”
He added: “It has been an interesting project to direct and is a triumph for the talented teams involved both at the University of East London and at KnowledgePoint. There are many more ways in which this technology could support our future strategies and it is good to know that UEL is ahead of the field.”
Steve Marlow, Head of Print Services at UEL said: "To be nationally recognized by different industry sectors at the same time is a remarkable achievement. These awards prove that the efforts we are making to develop technology and use it in new and exciting ways to improve user experience are working." For more information about this pioneering new service visit uel.ac.uk/myprospectus/
For further information visit the HEIST website http://www.eurorscgheist.com/events/awards.html or for details of last years awards follow this link.
http://www.eurorscgheist.com/events/winners.html
The project has been further nominated as a finalist for a prestigious HEIST Award – the premier event for Higher Education Marketing. It is being considered for the“Best use of Innovation and Creative Thinking” award. The judges will announce the awards at The Queens Hotel in Leeds on 26th May 2011.
Last year, at a gala event on the 11th of November 2010, it received a medal at the prestigious UK IT Industry Awards 2010, the Project Excellence Awards category for ‘Revolutionising Variable Data Print in the Education Sector’.
A week later on the 17th of November UEL’s personal prospectus building toolkit then took the Digital Printer Awards 2010 for its outstanding use of digital printing technology.
UEL’s ‘Build Your Own Prospectus’ system creates and sends a personalised printed prospectus to potential students based on their choices. As the personal prospectus is self-selected by the user it is naturally more relevant, making it a far more effective marketing tool.
The system also provides a profile for further communication and future evidence-based marketing, whilst also being greener and more cost effective.
“Jonathan Stephenson, Head of Digital Media at UEL, said: “These awards confirm our leading position in the development of user-focused marketing solutions based on an understanding of the expectations and objectives of the online prospect, linked to an on-demand digital print output.”
“The outcome is exactly what the potential customer wants. It is their own prospectus in every sense and we are finding that their further actions towards applying to study with us are much higher as a result than are obtained from more traditional approaches.”
He added: “It has been an interesting project to direct and is a triumph for the talented teams involved both at the University of East London and at KnowledgePoint. There are many more ways in which this technology could support our future strategies and it is good to know that UEL is ahead of the field.”
Steve Marlow, Head of Print Services at UEL said: "To be nationally recognized by different industry sectors at the same time is a remarkable achievement. These awards prove that the efforts we are making to develop technology and use it in new and exciting ways to improve user experience are working." For more information about this pioneering new service visit uel.ac.uk/myprospectus/
For further information visit the HEIST website http://www.eurorscgheist.com/events/awards.html or for details of last years awards follow this link.
http://www.eurorscgheist.com/events/winners.html
Friday, 9 December 2011
Kindle and Paper Paradox
Informal poll suggests nearly 70% of Kindle owners are over 40 http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/informal-poll-suggests-nearly-70-of-kindle-owners-are-over-40/ and paper is still preferred by young people http://www.twosides.info/video.asp?videoID=51
Friday, 2 December 2011
Xerox videos
Below are a number of Xerox videos that highlight the following topics. These include, change management, optimising the office environment and continuous improvement.
Assessment
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_assessments.html
Change management
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_changemanagement.html
Continuous improvement
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_continuousimprovement.html
Optimising the office environment
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_xos.html
Assessment
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_assessments.html
Change management
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_changemanagement.html
Continuous improvement
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_continuousimprovement.html
Optimising the office environment
http://www.xerox.co.uk/assets/motion/xgs/minitour_xos.html
Xerox Sustainability Calculator
The Xerox Sustainability Calculator can help you quantify your whole life costing and cost benefit analysis when considering changing printing systems. This calculator is very simple to use and useful for quantifying your financial and environmental sustainability. My one criticism of the calculator is that the actual cost and type of paper substrate impact is not in the calculation.
http://www.consulting.xerox.com/flash/thoughtleaders/suscalc/xeroxCalc.html
http://www.consulting.xerox.com/flash/thoughtleaders/suscalc/xeroxCalc.html
Ricoh Managed Document Services
Managed Document Services enables your employees to get access to the right information at the right time in the right form, no matter where they are. http://www.ricoh-europe.com/services-solutions/mds/
Ricoh House Interactive Virtual Tool
The Ricoh House is a virtual building that is set out the different areas (reception, meeting room, mailroom, print room ...) and departments (HR, Marketing, IT ...) as you can find in a company.
As a virtual visitor, you can select the place you want to explore and discover as we highlight some issues which you may be facing and why Ricoh offers solutions. In each room you will find a situation, the proposed solution and the benefits thereof.
http://www.ricoh-house.info/
As a virtual visitor, you can select the place you want to explore and discover as we highlight some issues which you may be facing and why Ricoh offers solutions. In each room you will find a situation, the proposed solution and the benefits thereof.
http://www.ricoh-house.info/
Labels:
and,
Document,
House,
Interactive,
Managed,
Managed Document Services,
Ricoh,
Ricoh House,
Services,
Tool,
virtual,
Virtual Tool
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Guide to Efficient Office Printing (Printing Efficiently and Greener)
This guide has been produced as a result of a ‘Printing Efficiently and Greener’ project carried out at the University of East London (UEL) in 2010, funded by the Joint Information Services Committee (JISC). The overall aim of the project was to investigate how barriers to Green ICT can be overcome through cross-departmental working when implementing staff behavioural change programmes.
The focus was on trialling staff printer consolidation, moving from numerous desktop printers to fewer multi-functional devices (MFDs) with swipe card access which have the capability to print / photocopy double-sided (duplex), scan and in some cases fax documents. The benefits include energy saving, space saving, reduction in carbon emissions, reduced resource consumption e.g. paper, ink cartridges, accountability and less administration.
This guide is a summary of our experiences i.e. what we did do, and what we could have done, highlighting the pitfalls and benefits of consolidating staff office printing. Each organisation is different with its own setup and circumstance but we hope this guide will help! Documents from the project e.g. staff questionnaires; audit results etc are available online: http://www.uel.ac.uk/greenthing/GreenICT.htm
Contents
Step 1 – Define your scope
Step 2 – Get the right people involved
Step 3 – Project planning
Step 4 – Site audit
Step 5 – Staff consultation
Step 6 – Communication
Step 7 – Behaviour change
Step 8 – Implementation
Step 9 – Data analysis
Step 10 – Keep up momentum
Report produced by: Sara Kassam, Energy & Environment Manager, University of East London
Thanks in no particular order to all involved in this project: Rob Bristow (JISC), Alan Lee (ICT, London South Bank University), Cameron Green and Conrad Healy (Global Action Plan), Darryl Newport, Rick Branston, Pervin Hussain, Kalton Ahmed, Paul Kernaghan, Linsey Cole, Steve Marlow, Richard Pennington, Gurdish Sandhu (UEL) and of course the pilot departments at UEL.
Step 1: Define your scope
1.1 Printing is a huge area of activity, ranging from everyday office printing to large volume specialist printing.
1.2 There are also different types of user including support staff, academic staff and students. Each will have different needs so the scope of your project needs to be clearly defined and the cost-benefits of options considered.
1.3 Decide if you are going to focus on a department or building as a trial or roll-out the project on a larger scale from the outset. We chose one non-academic department in an open plan office and two academic departments with cellular offices to pilot the initiative.
1.4 Introduction of ‘follow me printing’ or ‘print on demand’ systems where staff can use any MFD by swiping their ID card or typing in a code is recommended for maximum benefit.
1.5 Individual desktop printers should be seen as a sign of inefficiency rather than privilege or status. No person or department should ‘own’ a separate printer, scanner, photocopier, fax machine or MFD. Rather, this equipment should be an institutional resource, accessible to all staff regardless of physical location.
1.6 Someone must be assigned and responsible for the local group MFD. If not it can lead to neglect or misuse, which will increase down-time and customer dissatisfaction. The machine must also be proactively monitored on-line, so toner is sent to the assigned person before the toner runs out or paper can be obtained before that also runs out. This ensures that MFD uptime is maximised.
1.7 Also consider that printing is a means to an end, and that there are other ways of storing and sharing information. Printing on paper is simply one solution so your project needs to take into account other alternatives which can also be promoted.
Step 2: Get the right people involved
2.1 Choose your project partners carefully and ensure that they have the knowledge and skills that you need for the whole life of the project.
2.2 You should include people from the following departments (or equivalents); print services, ICT, sustainability/environment, procurement and marketing/communications. It is advised that the project manager is from the print services or ICT departments. Other expertise may be required at certain points in the project e.g. health and safety, fire safety.
2.3 Cross-departmental working can be challenging but will have huge benefits. Sounds obvious but it is surprising how little people from departments within the same institution talk to each other! Take some time to understand everyone’s methods of working and general constraints.
2.4 You will need buy-in at a senior level which may sound clichéd but ensure that this is proper buy-in. Directors, deans and senior managers you have approached need to have a thorough understanding of what you are trying to achieve especially as they should be giving up their desktop printers too!
2.5 Buy-in at an operational level is also important and this is where environmental champions can come in. You may already have a network set up at your institution or you may ask for volunteers especially for this project. We found departmental administrators to be invaluable throughout the project.
2.6 Contact your equipment provider to see what technical and training support they will make available. You may be staying with an incumbent or choosing a new provider for MFDs but either way, make sure they are fully signed up to the project. The ‘print on demand’ element was essential for us but the supplier struggled to provide us with a solution that worked effectively.
2.7 Ask your vice chancellor (VC) to endorse a printing strategy that promotes the efficient use of printing and multifunctional machines across campuses and invite the VC to be leading by example.
Step 3: Project planning
3.1 Produce a project plan with realistic timescales, allocate responsibilities and resources and ensure that everyone involved in the project has contributed to the plan.
3.2 If there a number of departments involved, you may want to develop service level agreements to really tie down what everybody is responsible for delivering.
3.3 Carry out a risk analysis of what could affect the success of your project but just identifying risks isn’t enough, do as much as you possibly can to reduce the likelihood an impact of them.
3.4 Research multifunctional devices, accountancy billing systems, blogs, ICT and print networks for the latest green technology and best value for money solutions in printing, scanning and photocopying.
3.5 Don’t take the technical solution for granted, setting this up can be just as complex as implementing a behavioural change campaign.
3.6 Find out if any departments in your organisation already use MFDs and what their experiences have been. People are more convinced if it has already been done elsewhere but it has to be the same type of department e.g. academic staff with cellular offices are more likely to pay attention to those with a similar setup, rather than support staff in an open plan office.
3.7 Think about every eventuality e.g. what happens to the desktop printers that are removed? Are they reused, donated to charity or sent for recycling? For us, the easiest way logistically was for our IT disposals company to collect the unused desktop printers and we asked for detailed information on how they were recycled to publicise to staff.
3.8 All departments are different so your approach will need to be tailored, for example academic staff will have different needs to service staff, and those in cellular offices will be different to open plan.
Step 4: Site audit
4.1 Information gathering can be time-consuming but really helpful for building your financial case, collating data for staff awareness and understanding the extent of environmental improvements that could be made.
4.2 Useful information includes quantity and cost of paper and toner/ink cartridges used. Some of this information may be available centrally from procurement or finance departments, but we also found that departments had their own devolved purchasing for printer consumables.
4.3 The number of imaging devices in general (printers, photocopiers, scanners, fax), and model/manufacturer of the equipment can be obtained through carrying out a site walkround.
This is a good opportunity to survey other items e.g. presence of recycling bins, if equipment is left on.
4.4 We estimated electricity consumption and CO2 emissions by using the ‘imaging’ tab of the SusteIT Energy and Carbon Footprinting tool: http://www.susteit.org.uk/files/category.php?catID=4
4.5 Your IT department may have information on the cost of maintaining and providing service support for desktop printers (having many models from different manufacturers can be very inefficient). Also check to see if any of the machines are under contract and their ownership status.
4.6 Analyse your information to produce easy-to-understand headline figures.
Example: UEL Site Audit Summary
2108 desks were surveyed and the following found:
- 788 imaging devices - 72% were desktop printers - 353 different models from 21 manufacturers - Account for 70 tonnes CO2 - Energy costs approx £10k PA
• Spent over £58,000 on printer cartridges last year.
• Use approximately 150 boxes of paper per week.
4.7 Working out potential savings from switching to MFDs (money, energy/CO2, time, resources) should help you to ‘sell’ the project and also produce a baseline which will help with evaluation of the project.
Step 5: Staff consultation
5.1 Consulting with staff from the outset helps to shape your project to ensure that needs are met as well as gaining some buy-in to what you’re trying to achieve.
5.2 We started with a general online questionnaire open to all staff, aiming to further understand knowledge, attitudes and behaviours around staff printing. The incentive was Fairtrade chocolate for the department who completed the most questionnaires and we had an 18% response rate.
5.3 As well as asking for people’s opinions on MFDs, we also took the opportunity to find out what staff thought generally about UEL’s environmental performance and facilities.
5.4 The online survey was followed by two focus groups held over lunch to obtain some more detailed insight. Priorities for staff were:
Reliable equipment, no long queues for printing and some form of backup in case of technical problems.
Confidentiality i.e. that printed documents wouldn’t be left lying around on top of printers.
Ability to print double-sided, to print in colour, to scan documents and to fax documents.
Training on more efficient printing methods.
Better information e.g. how to print duplex, what materials can be recycled and where.
5.5 After surveying all staff, we chose three pilot departments whose senior management were supportive of the project and also consulted with administrators for each of the departments. This brought up issues such as; a need to monitor print volumes and restricting access to colour printing where it is not essential. We also found that generally people wanted to be greener but just wanted to be shown how.
Step 6: Implementation
6.1 Use the site audit data and staff consultation to help produce an implementation plan that responds to concerns and needs that have been flagged up. Items to think about include:
What type of MFD will be placed where, are there any health and safety, access or fire safety issues. Reprographic rooms aren’t always available and putting MFDs in corridors can be tricky but not impossible.
Who will be responsible for ensuring paper supplies are available and that toner is changed when required.
How will the print on demand function work, through staff ID card, pin numbers or both.
How will the networking be set up so that staff can print from any machine.
How will print volume data be collected e.g. have all departmental cost codes been set up.
Are the MFDs provided centrally and therefore do departments need to be recharged/pay lease costs for using them.
Are there network points available/facility to install if the MFDs have fax capability.
How can scanned documents be collected i.e. are they emailed to the member of staff or sent to a shared drive.
How can scanned documents be reused, read or archived. i.e are they or can they be part of a university wide document management system.
What type of backup will be provided e.g. an administrator keeps a desktop printer just in case all MFDs in a building/area break down at once.
6.2 Once a piece of equipment becomes ‘communal’ it can be difficult to assign responsibility for maintenance. One way of dealing with this is a mixture of encouraging everyone to take ownership i.e. if there is problem to ensure that it is reported, and departmental administrators looking after machines in their area.
6.3 You will need to decide how best to remove desktop printers in a way that suits your organisation; staff can be very attached to their printers! Options include:
Install the MFDs, allow people to get used to using the new machines and then set a date for taking away desktop printers.
Allow people to keep their desktop printers until ink cartridges run out and not purchase any replacements through departmental budgets.
6.4 High level technical support is crucial (from in-house ICT, the external equipment provider or both) as there are likely to be teething problems. These need to be resolved immediately to avoid losing the goodwill or enthusiasm of staff who have switched from using desktop printers to MFDs.
Step 7: Behaviour change
7.1 There will be people who are very keen to switch to MFDs, those who are adamant that it will prevent them from working effectively and a group of people in the middle who with some support can be persuaded to use MFDs – this is the group to focus on.
7.2 It is important to sell the benefits and tailor these communications to different audiences. For example, some people may be interested in saving money, others in being greener and others will be keen on the additional functionality/time-saving features.
7.3 Make things as easy as possible! This can include having clear user instructions available above each MFD, a web page answering frequently asked questions and generally dealing with people’s questions as soon as possible to avoid disruption of their work.
7.4 Staff may be wary of having to use a new system and take some time to get used it. Continue to emphasise the benefits and ensure that genuine concerns are addressed.
7.5 Manage expectations. There are likely to be glitches when implementing the new system so be careful how you communicate the initiative to staff.
7.6 This is a good opportunity to promote other environmental issues such as recycling and energy efficiency.
7.7 One of our pilot departments found that posters above MFDs stating how much printing cost per sheet was an effective way of raising awareness – people started to share meeting agendas. Alternatives to printing can also be promoted e.g. using screens in meeting rooms to display meeting papers.
7.8 Showing people how much printing is usually wasted is effective too; one administrator collected a week’s worth of uncollected printing and showed her senior management team to reinforce the message that swipe card access to printers would be beneficial.
7.9 Make sure that your vice-chancellor’s department endorse the policy and get involved and give up their desktop printers early on. This will show support at the highest level and also provide senior management with an insight to the practicalities of the initiative.
7.10 Publicise the energy / resource / cost savings made wherever you can and feedback to staff on their progress, positively reinforcing ‘green’ behaviours.
Example: The Great Green Scheme
An interactive game was designed to illustrate the environmental actions that staff can take in their offices.
Based around the characters of an ‘energy bandit’ and ‘energy policeman’, actions include removing desktop printers in favour of MFDs, and recycling.
Each action has further detail outlining the benefits of carrying it out and the game which only takes a few minutes to play has proved popular with staff.
Game available at: www.uel.ac.uk/greenthing
Step 8: Communication
8.1 The aim is to let people know about the change, explain its purpose and the motivations driving it. How you do this will vary depending on who your audience is but always be clear about your message from the outset.
8.2 Methods we used included presentation to senior management teams of departments, one to one meetings with key people within departments and attendance at staff meetings.
8.3 Training sessions were held by our equipment provider so that people could ask questions and tryout the new equipment. Staff take-up varied, some felt that they didn’t have the time to attend whilst others said that they weren’t held on at appropriate times. Be aware of holiday times when scheduling activities as the bulk of teaching staff won’t be around.
8.4 Don’t rely on emails to communicate information. People don’t read them, read them too late or just don’t take the information in.
8.5 Sometimes information is better coming from within a department rather than from a central source. Often people are more likely to pay attention to their administrator rather than an unknown member of staff from Facilities or a senior manager. Also many staff dislike the top-down approach.
8.6 Keep up the communications. Regular reminders, updates, requests for feedback etc will help to embed the initiative and hopefully discover any unreported issues causing staff concern.
Step 9: Data analysis
9.1 This can be difficult as there are a number of variables involved but it needs to be done! Make your assumptions clear and show what data you have used to make your calculations.
9.2 Types of information that can be used include; staff hours spent photocopying and printing, quantity and cost of paper used over a certain time period, cost and quantity of toner cartridges, cost of leasing MFDs and cost per sheet printed compared to using desktop printers.
9.3 Sources of data include; the central procurement department, administrators in individual departments (often procurement for consumables is devolved), print services, the energy and environment team (for energy costs and CO2 emissions) etc.
9.4 After installation of MFDs and associated communication campaigns, survey staff again and assess their opinions. This information can be used to inform roll-out of the initiative to other departments or simply to evaluate the project as it is and see how ongoing improvements can be made.
Step 10: Keep up momentum
10.1 Continue to promote the principles of efficient printing through as many angles as possible e.g. during new build or refurbishment, take the opportunity to move people to an MFD environment and don’t let staff take desktop printers with them.
10.2 Use procurement / financial approval processes to prevent the purchase of desktop printers, develop departmental policy not to fund desktop ink cartridges etc.
10.3 And the final piece of advice is to stick with it, perseverance is essential - a greener, more efficient world of office printing is possible!
The focus was on trialling staff printer consolidation, moving from numerous desktop printers to fewer multi-functional devices (MFDs) with swipe card access which have the capability to print / photocopy double-sided (duplex), scan and in some cases fax documents. The benefits include energy saving, space saving, reduction in carbon emissions, reduced resource consumption e.g. paper, ink cartridges, accountability and less administration.
This guide is a summary of our experiences i.e. what we did do, and what we could have done, highlighting the pitfalls and benefits of consolidating staff office printing. Each organisation is different with its own setup and circumstance but we hope this guide will help! Documents from the project e.g. staff questionnaires; audit results etc are available online: http://www.uel.ac.uk/greenthing/GreenICT.htm
Contents
Step 1 – Define your scope
Step 2 – Get the right people involved
Step 3 – Project planning
Step 4 – Site audit
Step 5 – Staff consultation
Step 6 – Communication
Step 7 – Behaviour change
Step 8 – Implementation
Step 9 – Data analysis
Step 10 – Keep up momentum
Report produced by: Sara Kassam, Energy & Environment Manager, University of East London
Thanks in no particular order to all involved in this project: Rob Bristow (JISC), Alan Lee (ICT, London South Bank University), Cameron Green and Conrad Healy (Global Action Plan), Darryl Newport, Rick Branston, Pervin Hussain, Kalton Ahmed, Paul Kernaghan, Linsey Cole, Steve Marlow, Richard Pennington, Gurdish Sandhu (UEL) and of course the pilot departments at UEL.
Step 1: Define your scope
1.1 Printing is a huge area of activity, ranging from everyday office printing to large volume specialist printing.
1.2 There are also different types of user including support staff, academic staff and students. Each will have different needs so the scope of your project needs to be clearly defined and the cost-benefits of options considered.
1.3 Decide if you are going to focus on a department or building as a trial or roll-out the project on a larger scale from the outset. We chose one non-academic department in an open plan office and two academic departments with cellular offices to pilot the initiative.
1.4 Introduction of ‘follow me printing’ or ‘print on demand’ systems where staff can use any MFD by swiping their ID card or typing in a code is recommended for maximum benefit.
1.5 Individual desktop printers should be seen as a sign of inefficiency rather than privilege or status. No person or department should ‘own’ a separate printer, scanner, photocopier, fax machine or MFD. Rather, this equipment should be an institutional resource, accessible to all staff regardless of physical location.
1.6 Someone must be assigned and responsible for the local group MFD. If not it can lead to neglect or misuse, which will increase down-time and customer dissatisfaction. The machine must also be proactively monitored on-line, so toner is sent to the assigned person before the toner runs out or paper can be obtained before that also runs out. This ensures that MFD uptime is maximised.
1.7 Also consider that printing is a means to an end, and that there are other ways of storing and sharing information. Printing on paper is simply one solution so your project needs to take into account other alternatives which can also be promoted.
Step 2: Get the right people involved
2.1 Choose your project partners carefully and ensure that they have the knowledge and skills that you need for the whole life of the project.
2.2 You should include people from the following departments (or equivalents); print services, ICT, sustainability/environment, procurement and marketing/communications. It is advised that the project manager is from the print services or ICT departments. Other expertise may be required at certain points in the project e.g. health and safety, fire safety.
2.3 Cross-departmental working can be challenging but will have huge benefits. Sounds obvious but it is surprising how little people from departments within the same institution talk to each other! Take some time to understand everyone’s methods of working and general constraints.
2.4 You will need buy-in at a senior level which may sound clichéd but ensure that this is proper buy-in. Directors, deans and senior managers you have approached need to have a thorough understanding of what you are trying to achieve especially as they should be giving up their desktop printers too!
2.5 Buy-in at an operational level is also important and this is where environmental champions can come in. You may already have a network set up at your institution or you may ask for volunteers especially for this project. We found departmental administrators to be invaluable throughout the project.
2.6 Contact your equipment provider to see what technical and training support they will make available. You may be staying with an incumbent or choosing a new provider for MFDs but either way, make sure they are fully signed up to the project. The ‘print on demand’ element was essential for us but the supplier struggled to provide us with a solution that worked effectively.
2.7 Ask your vice chancellor (VC) to endorse a printing strategy that promotes the efficient use of printing and multifunctional machines across campuses and invite the VC to be leading by example.
Step 3: Project planning
3.1 Produce a project plan with realistic timescales, allocate responsibilities and resources and ensure that everyone involved in the project has contributed to the plan.
3.2 If there a number of departments involved, you may want to develop service level agreements to really tie down what everybody is responsible for delivering.
3.3 Carry out a risk analysis of what could affect the success of your project but just identifying risks isn’t enough, do as much as you possibly can to reduce the likelihood an impact of them.
3.4 Research multifunctional devices, accountancy billing systems, blogs, ICT and print networks for the latest green technology and best value for money solutions in printing, scanning and photocopying.
3.5 Don’t take the technical solution for granted, setting this up can be just as complex as implementing a behavioural change campaign.
3.6 Find out if any departments in your organisation already use MFDs and what their experiences have been. People are more convinced if it has already been done elsewhere but it has to be the same type of department e.g. academic staff with cellular offices are more likely to pay attention to those with a similar setup, rather than support staff in an open plan office.
3.7 Think about every eventuality e.g. what happens to the desktop printers that are removed? Are they reused, donated to charity or sent for recycling? For us, the easiest way logistically was for our IT disposals company to collect the unused desktop printers and we asked for detailed information on how they were recycled to publicise to staff.
3.8 All departments are different so your approach will need to be tailored, for example academic staff will have different needs to service staff, and those in cellular offices will be different to open plan.
Step 4: Site audit
4.1 Information gathering can be time-consuming but really helpful for building your financial case, collating data for staff awareness and understanding the extent of environmental improvements that could be made.
4.2 Useful information includes quantity and cost of paper and toner/ink cartridges used. Some of this information may be available centrally from procurement or finance departments, but we also found that departments had their own devolved purchasing for printer consumables.
4.3 The number of imaging devices in general (printers, photocopiers, scanners, fax), and model/manufacturer of the equipment can be obtained through carrying out a site walkround.
This is a good opportunity to survey other items e.g. presence of recycling bins, if equipment is left on.
4.4 We estimated electricity consumption and CO2 emissions by using the ‘imaging’ tab of the SusteIT Energy and Carbon Footprinting tool: http://www.susteit.org.uk/files/category.php?catID=4
4.5 Your IT department may have information on the cost of maintaining and providing service support for desktop printers (having many models from different manufacturers can be very inefficient). Also check to see if any of the machines are under contract and their ownership status.
4.6 Analyse your information to produce easy-to-understand headline figures.
Example: UEL Site Audit Summary
2108 desks were surveyed and the following found:
- 788 imaging devices - 72% were desktop printers - 353 different models from 21 manufacturers - Account for 70 tonnes CO2 - Energy costs approx £10k PA
• Spent over £58,000 on printer cartridges last year.
• Use approximately 150 boxes of paper per week.
4.7 Working out potential savings from switching to MFDs (money, energy/CO2, time, resources) should help you to ‘sell’ the project and also produce a baseline which will help with evaluation of the project.
Step 5: Staff consultation
5.1 Consulting with staff from the outset helps to shape your project to ensure that needs are met as well as gaining some buy-in to what you’re trying to achieve.
5.2 We started with a general online questionnaire open to all staff, aiming to further understand knowledge, attitudes and behaviours around staff printing. The incentive was Fairtrade chocolate for the department who completed the most questionnaires and we had an 18% response rate.
5.3 As well as asking for people’s opinions on MFDs, we also took the opportunity to find out what staff thought generally about UEL’s environmental performance and facilities.
5.4 The online survey was followed by two focus groups held over lunch to obtain some more detailed insight. Priorities for staff were:
Reliable equipment, no long queues for printing and some form of backup in case of technical problems.
Confidentiality i.e. that printed documents wouldn’t be left lying around on top of printers.
Ability to print double-sided, to print in colour, to scan documents and to fax documents.
Training on more efficient printing methods.
Better information e.g. how to print duplex, what materials can be recycled and where.
5.5 After surveying all staff, we chose three pilot departments whose senior management were supportive of the project and also consulted with administrators for each of the departments. This brought up issues such as; a need to monitor print volumes and restricting access to colour printing where it is not essential. We also found that generally people wanted to be greener but just wanted to be shown how.
Step 6: Implementation
6.1 Use the site audit data and staff consultation to help produce an implementation plan that responds to concerns and needs that have been flagged up. Items to think about include:
What type of MFD will be placed where, are there any health and safety, access or fire safety issues. Reprographic rooms aren’t always available and putting MFDs in corridors can be tricky but not impossible.
Who will be responsible for ensuring paper supplies are available and that toner is changed when required.
How will the print on demand function work, through staff ID card, pin numbers or both.
How will the networking be set up so that staff can print from any machine.
How will print volume data be collected e.g. have all departmental cost codes been set up.
Are the MFDs provided centrally and therefore do departments need to be recharged/pay lease costs for using them.
Are there network points available/facility to install if the MFDs have fax capability.
How can scanned documents be collected i.e. are they emailed to the member of staff or sent to a shared drive.
How can scanned documents be reused, read or archived. i.e are they or can they be part of a university wide document management system.
What type of backup will be provided e.g. an administrator keeps a desktop printer just in case all MFDs in a building/area break down at once.
6.2 Once a piece of equipment becomes ‘communal’ it can be difficult to assign responsibility for maintenance. One way of dealing with this is a mixture of encouraging everyone to take ownership i.e. if there is problem to ensure that it is reported, and departmental administrators looking after machines in their area.
6.3 You will need to decide how best to remove desktop printers in a way that suits your organisation; staff can be very attached to their printers! Options include:
Install the MFDs, allow people to get used to using the new machines and then set a date for taking away desktop printers.
Allow people to keep their desktop printers until ink cartridges run out and not purchase any replacements through departmental budgets.
6.4 High level technical support is crucial (from in-house ICT, the external equipment provider or both) as there are likely to be teething problems. These need to be resolved immediately to avoid losing the goodwill or enthusiasm of staff who have switched from using desktop printers to MFDs.
Step 7: Behaviour change
7.1 There will be people who are very keen to switch to MFDs, those who are adamant that it will prevent them from working effectively and a group of people in the middle who with some support can be persuaded to use MFDs – this is the group to focus on.
7.2 It is important to sell the benefits and tailor these communications to different audiences. For example, some people may be interested in saving money, others in being greener and others will be keen on the additional functionality/time-saving features.
7.3 Make things as easy as possible! This can include having clear user instructions available above each MFD, a web page answering frequently asked questions and generally dealing with people’s questions as soon as possible to avoid disruption of their work.
7.4 Staff may be wary of having to use a new system and take some time to get used it. Continue to emphasise the benefits and ensure that genuine concerns are addressed.
7.5 Manage expectations. There are likely to be glitches when implementing the new system so be careful how you communicate the initiative to staff.
7.6 This is a good opportunity to promote other environmental issues such as recycling and energy efficiency.
7.7 One of our pilot departments found that posters above MFDs stating how much printing cost per sheet was an effective way of raising awareness – people started to share meeting agendas. Alternatives to printing can also be promoted e.g. using screens in meeting rooms to display meeting papers.
7.8 Showing people how much printing is usually wasted is effective too; one administrator collected a week’s worth of uncollected printing and showed her senior management team to reinforce the message that swipe card access to printers would be beneficial.
7.9 Make sure that your vice-chancellor’s department endorse the policy and get involved and give up their desktop printers early on. This will show support at the highest level and also provide senior management with an insight to the practicalities of the initiative.
7.10 Publicise the energy / resource / cost savings made wherever you can and feedback to staff on their progress, positively reinforcing ‘green’ behaviours.
Example: The Great Green Scheme
An interactive game was designed to illustrate the environmental actions that staff can take in their offices.
Based around the characters of an ‘energy bandit’ and ‘energy policeman’, actions include removing desktop printers in favour of MFDs, and recycling.
Each action has further detail outlining the benefits of carrying it out and the game which only takes a few minutes to play has proved popular with staff.
Game available at: www.uel.ac.uk/greenthing
Step 8: Communication
8.1 The aim is to let people know about the change, explain its purpose and the motivations driving it. How you do this will vary depending on who your audience is but always be clear about your message from the outset.
8.2 Methods we used included presentation to senior management teams of departments, one to one meetings with key people within departments and attendance at staff meetings.
8.3 Training sessions were held by our equipment provider so that people could ask questions and tryout the new equipment. Staff take-up varied, some felt that they didn’t have the time to attend whilst others said that they weren’t held on at appropriate times. Be aware of holiday times when scheduling activities as the bulk of teaching staff won’t be around.
8.4 Don’t rely on emails to communicate information. People don’t read them, read them too late or just don’t take the information in.
8.5 Sometimes information is better coming from within a department rather than from a central source. Often people are more likely to pay attention to their administrator rather than an unknown member of staff from Facilities or a senior manager. Also many staff dislike the top-down approach.
8.6 Keep up the communications. Regular reminders, updates, requests for feedback etc will help to embed the initiative and hopefully discover any unreported issues causing staff concern.
Step 9: Data analysis
9.1 This can be difficult as there are a number of variables involved but it needs to be done! Make your assumptions clear and show what data you have used to make your calculations.
9.2 Types of information that can be used include; staff hours spent photocopying and printing, quantity and cost of paper used over a certain time period, cost and quantity of toner cartridges, cost of leasing MFDs and cost per sheet printed compared to using desktop printers.
9.3 Sources of data include; the central procurement department, administrators in individual departments (often procurement for consumables is devolved), print services, the energy and environment team (for energy costs and CO2 emissions) etc.
9.4 After installation of MFDs and associated communication campaigns, survey staff again and assess their opinions. This information can be used to inform roll-out of the initiative to other departments or simply to evaluate the project as it is and see how ongoing improvements can be made.
Step 10: Keep up momentum
10.1 Continue to promote the principles of efficient printing through as many angles as possible e.g. during new build or refurbishment, take the opportunity to move people to an MFD environment and don’t let staff take desktop printers with them.
10.2 Use procurement / financial approval processes to prevent the purchase of desktop printers, develop departmental policy not to fund desktop ink cartridges etc.
10.3 And the final piece of advice is to stick with it, perseverance is essential - a greener, more efficient world of office printing is possible!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















